Why are we getting fatter? Food is cheaper than ever

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

WASHINGTON– Forget everything you know about what’s making us fat.

We hear a lot about Americans being fast food-addicted couch potatoes, and while that does play a role in the nation’s expanding waist lines, a new study concludes it’s not the driving force behind the obesity epidemic.

Instead all Americans — no matter what income level they have and no matter what neighborhood they live in — are getting bigger because food is cheaper than ever before, the study authors say. Simply put, we’re spending less of our total budget on food so we’re buying more.

The study, published in the June edition of the journal CA Cancer, found that people in 1930 spent about a fourth of their disposable income on food. Today food takes up about a tenth of our disposable income. Food is also easier to prepare and easier to purchase than it was in 1930.

That means Americans aren’t just eating more high-calorie food, they are eating more of a variety of foods. Consequently, Americans have consumed, on average, about 20% more calories since the 1970s.

Lead study authors Roland Sturm and An Ruopeng hope it will lay to rest some myths about obesity.

“If you look at the data over time, you actually see a slight increase in exercise. And Americans have more access to fruits and vegetables,” said Roland Sturm who is a senior economist at the RAND Corporation. “It’s not Southern hospitality that is driving this trend, nor is it income or education. Really nothing protects us from this challenge of obesity.”

On average, Americans have been getting fatter since at least the 1950s, maybe even longer. While the data isn’t perfect, experts looking at health records for men between the ages of 40 and 49 see a steady increase in body mass index since 1900.

Obesity isn’t only a problem for people who want to wear bikinis to the beach. Excess body fat can raise a person’s risk for heart disease, cancer, diabetes, stroke and chronic illnesses.

“What this article reinforces is that we need to continue our research to find what combination of strategies will be most effective long term in helping all of us live healthier lives,” said Colleen Doyle, director of nutrition and physical activity for the American Cancer Society.

Doyle suggests a better built environment where it is easy for people to engage in physical activity — meaning sidewalks and bike lanes and safer streets. Also helpful would be changing social norms so that families will expect healthier school meals and calorie counts are readily available on restaurant menus.

“No one thing is the solution to this problem we are having,” Doyle said.

This latest study points out a few positives. Americans are exercising more: Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show an uptick in the number of people who say they get 30 minutes of moderate exercise five or more days a week, or 20 minutes of vigorous activity on three or more days (about 51% in 2009, compared to 46% in 2001).

The availability of fresh produce has also increased over the last 40 years, with a 27% increase in fresh fruit and a 21% increase in fresh vegetables per capita from 1970 to 2010. But the number of people who actually eat fruits and vegetables has stayed flat.

That may be one area where public policy could help.

Agriculture policy “has a huge impact on what people eat,” said study co-author An Ruopeng. “Maybe instead of promoting commodity food like corn and soy, we could instead incentivize small farms to grow more fruits and vegetables.”

“We don’t want food to become really expensive again; that is not the answer,” said Sturm. “The markets were successful in solving a really old problem” of food scarcity. “Now we have a new problem in the works with obesity, so we may need the market forces now to nudge in a different direction.”

Sturm believes a policy South Africa has tried may help. In some 800 supermarkets in the African country, healthy foods were subsidized and available at a 25% discount. The price did “nudge people in the right direction” to eat healthier.

A tax on sugary foods and sodas in Mexico was also introduced last year, but experts are still waiting to see what impact that policy will have on eating habits. Here in the United States, some members of Congress have introduced similar taxes, but haven’t been able to get them passed.

It will take more than public policy to end the obesity epidemic, the study authors say.

“There is no silver bullet,” Sturm said. True change would have to come from the ground up.

Smoking, for instance, used to be common indoors, but policy and social attitude has made that less socially acceptable.

“When people come over to visit, you offer them a coke or freshly baked cookies,” Sturm said. “That is the social norm. But maybe in the future we will look at that behavior like we do about public smoking.”


  • steve

    Whoever thinks that food is cheaper than ever obviously doesn’t do the grocery shopping for their family.

  • billthewelder

    I have to agree, this study is all catywampus with inaccuracy. Price of food at the grocery store has risen in correlation to the cost of fuel but rarely goes down as it goes down and with the droughts that have hit throughout the country has pushed the price increase in foods. The only foods that have not risen much or at all are the ones that contain very little actual edible and digestible material and are only called food in the loosest of terms.

  • ladywraith

    I call shenanigans on this one. Even cheap staples that are used by people living from paycheck to paycheck are becoming outrageous. Most Americans can’t afford to eat healthy, and have to live off of foods made of fillers and chemicals. Let’s also look at stores selling bad products. While living in Tacoma, it was not unusual to buy a gallon of milk and find it had already spoiled. In Kansas I have purchased baked goods only to find the bottoms molded. Stores offer to replace such goods, but one doesn’t want to chance a repeat. We then go to other stores and spend the money over again. I doubt that was considered in this study.

  • zeppeki

    What!? Food is not cheaper than ever before! Even according to this article, our standard of living is higher than it was in the 30s, but that’s not the same thing as food being cheaper. That’s like saying, “Now that I’m a millionaire, houses are cheaper!” No, houses are not cheaper, I can just afford one now. I’ve been buying groceries for almost 20 years now and I’ve only seen prices go up and up. I also hear my mom complain about how much food costs now compared to when she grew up, and in turn my grandmother says the same. I’ve done no research on this and I’m neither a nutritional nor an economic expert by any means, but I’m willing to bet any amount of money that the reason people are getting bigger is because they’re taking in more calories that they’re burning. So, to me, this article asks the wrong question. The question is, Why are Americans taking in more calories than they’re burning? To me, any good article should ask and answer the right questions.

Comments are closed.