Maj. Gen. Harold Greene — a longtime officer who was leading efforts to train soldiers in Afghanistan — was killed in Tuesday’s attack. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno released a condolence statement confirming the death of Greene.
“Our thoughts and prayers are with Maj. Gen. Harold J. Greene’s family, and the families of our soldiers who were injured today in the tragic events that took place in Afghanistan,” Odierno said the in statement, referring to other officers who were hurt.
“These soldiers were professionals, committed to the mission. It is their service and sacrifice that define us as an Army. ”
Pentagon officials went out of their way to say the incident would not change the relationship between U.S. and Afghan forces.
“I’ve seen no indication that there’s a degradation of trust between coalition members and their Afghan counterparts,” Pentagon spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby told reporters Tuesday.
But the deadly ambush at a premier training facility for Afghan military officers raises questions about the vetting process for Afghan soldiers and also the upcoming handover of security to Afghan forces.
“When something like this happens, in the least it creates a crisis of confidence for Afghans and for us,” said Vali Nasr, dean of the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.
So far the Taliban has acknowledged the general’s killing, but hasn’t claimed responsibility for it.
The Pentagon isn’t commenting on the possibility of Taliban involvement, saying the Afghan military and international forces are in the early stages of an investigation.
Nasr told CNN’s “The Situation Room” that the attack raises serious concerns as the United States prepares to draw down forces from Afghanistan and hand over security to Afghan forces.
“The Taliban have proven today they can infiltrate this force at will,” he said. “The discipline we are seeking or that we are claiming is not there, and I think it is very difficult for the administration to say that everything is going according to plan, as if this is just an isolated incident and we can just leave.”
‘Routine visit’ turns deadly
The attack occurred during a routine visit to the Marshal Fahim National Defense University in Kabul to look at improvements made at the school, Kirby said.
The shooter was wearing an Afghan military uniform and is believed to be someone who had served for some time in a unit of the Afghan armed forces, Kirby said.
“A person that we believe was an Afghan soldier opened fire and hit many with his weapon,” he said.
In addition to the general’s slaying, up to 15 coalition troops were wounded in the shooting rampage, Kirby told reporters.
He said some of them sustained serious, but not life-threatening, injuries.
The Afghan Defense Ministry described the shooter as a “terrorist” and said Afghan soldiers shot him dead.
Insider attacks: ‘A threat you can’t completely eliminate’
This isn’t the first time people dressed in Afghan security forces uniforms have attacked coalition forces who have worked to thwart such violence.
“The insider threat is one that we’ve been focused on for quite some time. … It is a threat you can’t completely eliminate,” Kirby told CNN.
But it’s a threat that can be mitigated, he said. And officials stress that statistics show that the numbers of such attacks have decreased.
In 2012, so-called “green on blue” insider attacks took the lives of dozens of coalition troops, and the U.S. command in Kabul halted some joint operations with Afghan security forces, CNN has previously reported.
Two attackers wearing Afghan military uniforms killed two U.S. service members in February in Afghanistan, the military publication Stars and Stripes reported.
In October 2013, a man in an Afghan soldier’s uniform shot and killed an ISAF member in eastern Afghanistan, CNN reported.
According to an April 2013 Pentagon report, insider attacks against ISAF forces declined from 48 attacks in 2012 to 15 attacks in 2013. In the first quarter of 2014, there were two insider attacks against ISAF.
“Despite this sharp decline, these attacks may still have strategic effects on the campaign and could jeopardize the relationship between coalition and ANSF [Afghan National Security Forces] personnel,” the report reads.
Kirby called insider attacks “a pernicious threat” that are “difficult to always ascertain, to come to grips with… anywhere, particularly in a place like Afghanistan.”
“Afghanistan is still a war zone,” he said.
Numerous security protocols were instituted a few years ago to help ensure military personnel are safe, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. The United States will “review” the circumstances of Tuesday’s shooting to see if any changes should be made.
White House: Attack is ‘painful reminder’ of troops’ sacrifice
President Obama was briefed about the shooting and called Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, to get more information, Earnest said.
“While we have made tremendous progress in disrupting, dismantling and defeating al Qaeda operations and leadership in Afghanistan and progress in winding down U.S. involvement in that conflict, this shooting, of course is a painful reminder of the service and sacrifice that our men and women in uniform make every day for this country,” Earnest said.
In February the Obama administration announced for the first time that it had begun planning for the possible withdrawal of all U.S. troops by the end of 2014 if Afghanistan did not sign a security agreement pertaining to rights of U.S. troops operating there.
Kirby told reporters Tuesday that Afghan National Security Forces “continue to perform at a very strong level of competence and confidence, and warfare capability.”
The U.S. military feels that the Afghan military “grows stronger by the week” and noted that they are already “in the lead in combat missions” throughout the country, he said.
“They’ll be completely in the lead for military operations by the end of the year,” Kirby said. “We see no change in that.”