NewsMilitary

Actions

Four Norfolk-based destroyers to remain near Syria

Posted at 3:03 PM, Aug 24, 2013
and last updated 2013-08-24 15:05:54-04

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Four Norfolk-based destroyers will remain in the Mediterranean Sea as President Obama and the Pentagon consider what to do about this week’s alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria.

The USS Ramage has arrived in the region, a defense official said late Friday. It was intended to replace the USS Mahan, but the Mahan will remain temporarily along with the USS Gravelly and USS Barry. All four are equipped with cruise missiles.

If claims that Syria used chemical weapons this week are true, a speedy response will be needed to prevent another such attack, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said.

Hagel’s comments Friday came after a senior Defense Department official told CNN that military planners have updated Syrian target lists.

And it was disclosed that a fourth U.S. ship armed with cruise missiles has arrived in the eastern Mediterranean Sea.

A United Nations team is in Syria attempting to investigate a claim by the nation’s rebels that a chemical weapons attack by President Bashar al-Assad’s forces outside Damascus killed more than 1,300 people.

Hagel addressed the issue aboard a military plane headed to Malaysia.

“We will determine at some point here very shortly what did happen,” he said, according to an account posted on the Defense Department’s website.

“If, in fact, this was a deliberate use and attack by the Syrian government on its own people using chemical weapons, there may be another attack coming,” Hagel said. “A very quick assessment of what happened and whatever appropriate response should be made.”

Hagel said the American military was providing President Barack Obama “with options for all contingencies, and that requires positioning our forces [and] positioning our assets to be able to carry out whatever options the president might choose.”

He did not provide specifics on what the options were.

In a CNN exclusive interview with “New Day,” Obama defended his decision not to intervene militarily in the Syrian conflict. But he predicted that American focus on the civil war would be necessary for the fighting to come to an end.

“I think it is fair to say that, as difficult as the problem is, this is something that is going to require America’s attention and hopefully the entire international community’s attention,” Obama told CNN’s Chris Cuomo.

The president has said he does not anticipate using ground forces in Syria. Other military options could include airstrikes by fighter jets or cruise missiles.

So far, the president has authorized a limited amount of military hardware for the rebels in addition to logistical and humanitarian assistance.

The senior Defense Department official who spoke to CNN said options for direct military action would include targeting al-Assad’s capability to deliver chemical weapons.

Target lists could include government buildings and military installations, the official said, but the military must have flexible plans to target forces and equipment which “continue to move.”

Sen. John McCain, an advocate for a more forceful U.S. response to the Syrian conflict, has suggested that American air power could take out runways and planes used by al-Assad’s forces that he said are “dominating the battlefields and the towns and the cities.”

McCain also has advocated giving rebels anti-aircraft and anti-missile weapons to establish a “no fly zone.” But administration officials have cautioned that some Syrian rebel factions have ties to al Qaeda terrorists.

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said in a letter to a member of Congress this week that arming rebels requires “choosing one among many sides.”

“It is my belief that the side we choose must be ready to promote their interests and ours when the balance shifts in their favor. Today, they are not,” Dempsey wrote.